<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Francois Faubert &#187; Bandwidth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francoisfaubert.com/tag/bandwidth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francoisfaubert.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Soooo&#8230; AJAX really does save bandwidth&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/02/17/soooo-ajax-really-does-save-bandwidth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/02/17/soooo-ajax-really-does-save-bandwidth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>francoisfaubert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusictank.com/fake/2006/02/17/soooo-ajax-really-does-save-bandwidth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s quite obvious that not having to load a page countless times will save you bandwidth. Even I was aware of that. It&#8217;s just nice to see people making concrete tests to prove the concept. 
Keep in mind however that this is not the best case scenario for rendering all of a website&#8217;s content because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite obvious that not having to load a page countless times will save you bandwidth. Even <em>I</em> was aware of that. It&#8217;s just nice to <a href="http://webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/AjaxBandwidth/index.html">see people making concrete tests</a> to prove the concept. </p>
<p>Keep in mind however that this is not the best case scenario for rendering all of a website&#8217;s content because of the infamous back button problem.</p>
<p>By using AJAX to update the HTML content of an html template, these guys managed to save more than 60% of the necessary bandwidth using traditional methods.</p>
<p>Now someone on the web only needs to make the same types of benchmarks from the database&#8217;s perspective and I&#8217;d be really happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/02/17/soooo-ajax-really-does-save-bandwidth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
