<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Francois Faubert &#187; Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francoisfaubert.com/tag/accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francoisfaubert.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Accessibility Vs. The Real World</title>
		<link>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/08/25/accessibility-vs-the-real-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/08/25/accessibility-vs-the-real-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>francoisfaubert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusictank.com/fake/2006/08/25/accessibility-vs-the-real-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Croft, not afraid of being lynched by the new wave of accessibility-aware Web 2.0 designers, has posted a new article asking if accessibilty has been taken too far.
While I&#8217;m guessing his opinion may have been toned down on the way from his head to his hands, I do believe he has a point. To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Croft, not afraid of being lynched by the new wave of accessibility-aware Web 2.0 designers, has posted a new article asking if <a href="http://www2.jeffcroft.com/2006/aug/21/has-accessibility-been-taken-too-far/">accessibilty has been taken too far</a>.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m guessing his opinion may have been toned down on the way from his head to his hands, I do believe he has a point. To paraphrase and sum his opinion: &#8220;Accessibility is cool and all because it&#8217;s bad to ignore people with disabilities, but you can&#8217;t expect a company to spend all their web design budget for 0.5% of their customers. Therefore, some site aren&#8217;t 100% accessible on purpose.&#8221;</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s true. In real life, my employer gives me, say, 4 days to finish a website. It&#8217;s good enough if I can be satisfied with the semantics of things in that period of time. Odds are I won&#8217;t have any time left to make separate style sheets with high-contrast colors, one with big text, etc.</p>
<p>All can agree that it&#8217;s a good thing that there&#8217;s a lot more awareness around the accessibility of online content at the moment. </p>
<p>However, just like in any trend, it&#8217;s all too easy to pick on those who don&#8217;t follow it, never considering all the reasons for them not doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.francoisfaubert.com/2006/08/25/accessibility-vs-the-real-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
